by Jared Wesley
Three things to know about the 2015 Federal Election
1. This is a fixed date election, set for
October 19, 2015. While the fixed
date election law has been in place since 2007, if held on that date, this
would mark the first time that an election has been held at the prescribed
time. In 2008 and 2011, amid minority
governments, Parliament was dissolved in advance of the fixed date. The law does not prohibit the calling of such
“snap” elections
before the fixed date. Indeed, the dates
established by the Act are not
legally binding, and do not disrupt the power of the Prime Minister to call
on the Governor General to drop the writs for a new election, nor the power of
the Governor General to grant such a request.
There is much
debate as to whether the Prime Minister could or should call an early
election, but at this stage, all signs point to October 19, 2015.
2. There are new seats and new riding boundaries. Given population growth in certain parts of
the country, a total of thirty
(30) new seats will be added to the House of Commons following the next
election. The House will grow by just
under 10 percent, reaching 338 Members of Parliament (MPs). At the same time,
riding boundaries have been redrawn to ensure that all Canadians are
represented relatively equitably and appropriately. All told, these changes will mean new
competitive dynamics in several regions of the country, and introduce a host of
new MPs to Parliament.
3. There are several new national party leaders. 2015 will mark the first time New Democratic
Party leader, Thomas Mulcair, and Liberal Party leader, Justin Trudeau, will
lead their respective parties into a national campaign, as will Bloc Quebecois
leader Mario Beaulieu. This compares
with Conservative Party leader Stephen Harper, who has led a national party in
four previous campaigns (2004, 2006, 2008, 2011), and Elizabeth May, who has
campaigned as leader of the Green Party in the previous two elections.
Three myths about the 2015 Federal Election
Myth #1: The
campaign is likely feature a “great debate” about the future of Canada.
Reality: Canadians
have seldom experienced grand clashes over public policy in the lead up to
their general elections. The
1988 “Free Trade Election” was arguably the most recent campaign to pit
parties against one another in a great debate over the future direction of the
country. Rather than engaging in a
full-throated defence of their position on each and every issue (from health
care to foreign affairs), Canadian parties fight campaigns by competing to
elevate “their issues” to the top of the agenda. In other words, rather than
featuring a great debate, campaigns are more a competition to define
the ‘ballot question’. Right-leaning
parties seek to make the campaign all about tax relief and other
issues that they “own” (i.e., those that voters trust them to handle more than
any other parties), while left-leaning parties try to elevate topics like
social programs to the top of voters’ minds.
Because Canadian voters are more
or less in consensus on the major issues of the day (most favor tax relief and enhanced social programs, as
illogical as that may appear), parties are unlikely to venture a minority
opinion on issues that their opponents own.
Like ships passing in the night, these parties tend not to engage each
other on the others’ ‘owned issues’, but rather try to de-emphasize the others’
agendas and promote their own.
Myth #2: Citizens are likely to experience a
pan-Canadian contest.
Reality: Different
parties have varying rates of popularity across the country. In recent elections, the Conservatives have
performed well in Ontario and the West; the Liberals, in Ontario, Quebec, and
the Atlantic region; and the New Democrats, in Ontario and Quebec. Accordingly, Canadian parties have devoted
different levels of campaign resources to different regions of the country, and
different ridings, depending on where they are most competitive. This means that voters in southern Ontario
may experience a close three-way race between the Conservatives, New Democrats,
and Liberals, while those in parts of Montreal may experience a two-way contest
between the NDP and Liberals. Voters in
so-called “safe seats” (in rural parts of the Prairies where the Conservatives
dominate, for instance) may not see a competitive campaign at all. To call the 2015 campaign a single election
neglects the fact that each region, indeed each riding, features its own unique
dynamics.
Myth #3: Understanding Canadian politics and elections
is too difficult for the average would-be voter.
Reality: To help break down some of the complexity,
and bring the top issues to the forefront and in greater focus, IPAC Edmonton
is hosting a free, online event on October 20, 2014 (12:00pm MT / 2:00pm ET). The
live panel features insights from three leading experts on Canadian
politics: Susan Delacourt (Toronto Star), Éric Grenier (ThreeHundredEight.com), and Peter Loewen
(University of Toronto). Tune in live on
YouTube (bit.ly/RoadTo2015), and Twitter
(#RoadTo2015). The event will be
archived on YouTube for future viewing.
Jared Wesley earned his PhD in political science from the University of Calgary. He is an adjunct professor of political science at the University of Alberta, adjunct professor of political studies at the University of Manitoba, and Pracademic Chair of the Institute for Public Administration of Canada (IPAC) (Edmonton Regional Group). Find him on LinkedIn, Twitter (@ipracademic), and Flipboard.
No comments:
Post a Comment