Three things to know about government scientists' communications:
1. Government
scientists’ ability to communicate with the public has become more restricted
in recent years. There have been many examples where government scientists
could not discuss their research with journalists, and a survey of government scientists showed that
90% do not feel they can speak freely about their research.
2. This report, the first assessment of media policies for
government scientists in Canada, shows that policies do not promote
open science communication, nor protect against political interference.
3. Media
policies for scientists in Canada are far more restrictive than our neighbours
to the South: U.S. policies received an average grade of a 69% in 2008 and 75% in 2013, compared to the 2014 Canadian average of 55%.
Three myths about government scientists' communications::
Myth 1: Government communication policies are only important
for scientists.
Reality: Open science communication is important for all
Canadians. Current media policies could prevent taxpayer-funded scientists from
sharing their expertise on important issues, ranging from drug policy to climate
change. A healthy democracy requires open communication and informed public
debate.
Myth 2: All federal scientists are subject to the same media
policy.
Reality: While there is a government-wide communication
policy, most departments have developed their own policies that differ greatly
in how well they promote open science communication (ranging from B- to F).
Myth 3: Departments with the most complaints of government
scientists being muzzled have the worst media policies.
Reality: Many examples of scientists who have been prevented
from communicating their research have come from Environment Canada and
Fisheries and Oceans Canada. These departments scored in the mid-range compared
with other departments. The highest scoring department was, in fact, the
department of National Defence.
Katie
Gibbs is a biologist, community organizer and advocate for science and
evidence-based policies. She’s the co-founder and Executive Director of
Evidence for Democracy, a national, non-partisan, not-for-profit organization
that promotes science integrity and the transparent use of evidence in
government decision-making.
Excellent post. Really enjoyed reading this.
ReplyDelete